630 Rosemary's Baby

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Message
Author
User avatar
devlinnn
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 3:23 am
Location: three miles from space

#26 Post by devlinnn » Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:15 am

Thanks for those pics Galen. I just wish I could pull off the tuck-in the way Polanski does. He was the 60s, dippin' his toe in every pool....

I had a huge Polanski pigout last year and have always loved RB - Ruth Gordon continually knocks me out. But Chinatown and Bitter Moon are my picks of his these days.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

#27 Post by Antoine Doinel » Wed Jun 18, 2008 8:47 am

Wow! Phenomenal set photos. Thanks Galen!

User avatar
Lino
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 6:18 am
Location: Sitting End
Contact:

#28 Post by Lino » Sun Jul 13, 2008 10:52 pm

Just why this phenomenal trailer isn't on the current Paramount DVD, I will never know.

User avatar
Murdoch
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 11:59 pm
Location: Upstate NY

#29 Post by Murdoch » Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:37 pm

Extraordinary trailer, I rarely praise trailers but that perfectly encapsulated the surreality and eeriness of the film itself. If I had seen that back in the 60s I would have been first in line to buy a ticket.

User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Rosemary's Baby

#30 Post by Jeff » Mon Jul 16, 2012 3:39 pm

Criterion announced for October 2012

User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:46 am

Re: Rosemary's Baby

#31 Post by HerrSchreck » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:35 pm

Weak package? Or is it just me . . . I love this film and was really looking for some grandslamming extras on this.

Helps also that I'm reading Helter Skelter right now for--believe it or not-- the first time.

User avatar
denti alligator
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"

Re: Rosemary's Baby

#32 Post by denti alligator » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:37 pm

I'm satisfied. Nice Komeda docu.

User avatar
Tom Hagen
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:35 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#33 Post by Tom Hagen » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:43 pm

I was hoping that they would have licensed The Tenant as a sequential spine.

User avatar
Professor Wagstaff
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:27 pm

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#34 Post by Professor Wagstaff » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:50 pm

Hopefully the new interviews with be a bit more candid than the informative but guarded featurette from the old DVD. I would have liked more extras but as this is one of my very favorite films, I'm sure I would have bought it under any circumstances.

britcom68

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#35 Post by britcom68 » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:52 pm

Does this include the original featurette included on the old Paramount dvd?

ianungstad
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:20 pm

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#36 Post by ianungstad » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:53 pm

They came up with some pretty weak supplements for Harold and Maude too. In the extras you hear mention about the test footage the writer shot for Paramount, the long running Harold and Maude stage production, various deleted scenes; that would have made great extras. If they had spent a little more time on the release they could have put together a much more satisfying product.

I agree that the package for Rosemary's Baby sounds a little weak. This has been a problem with Criterion over the last few years. They get some pretty high profile releases and they don't put together the kind of packages they used to in the old days. It's better than what Paramount offered, which is reason for celebration but so much is left off the table.

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#37 Post by mfunk9786 » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:56 pm

Who's to say that time is the only reason these packages aren't as complete as you'd like (I think Harold and Maude is a lovely release, for the record)? Bonus features for popular studio films like these are more expensive to get done, and I think they try to put an emphasis on quality over quantity. As much as I'd like to have seen a commentary/video essay on this one, who's to say that that was possible (wrangling worthwhile participants, cost, etc)?

User avatar
Professor Wagstaff
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:27 pm

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#38 Post by Professor Wagstaff » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:57 pm

britcom68 wrote:Does this include the original featurette included on the old Paramount dvd?
No, the interviews are new. Dick Sylbert was part of the original featurette and his name isn't listed as an archival interview subject (since he died a decade ago).

User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#39 Post by The Narrator Returns » Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:58 pm

mfunk9786 wrote:Who's to say that time is the only reason these packages aren't as complete as you'd like (I think Harold and Maude is a lovely release, for the record)? Bonus features for popular studio films like these are more expensive to get done, and I think they try to put an emphasis on quality over quantity. As much as I'd like to have seen a commentary/video essay on this one, who's to say that that was possible (wrangling worthwhile participants, cost, etc)?
And I hate all that "Oh, Criterion isn't as good as it once was" whining.

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#40 Post by mfunk9786 » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:02 pm

Especially since something comes along to disprove it every. single. time.

ianungstad
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:20 pm

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#41 Post by ianungstad » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:04 pm

Depends on the situation but I don't think it's whining. They could have interviewed Bud Cort in addition to the other potential supplements that I listed above. We are now in a period where we are getting 1-2 major studio releases a month and they just don't show the same amount of attention to high profile titles that they used to. The market is smaller overall and they are suddenly faced with the rights to more high profile titles than they can keep up with. It's not a complaint; I'll buy Rosemary's Baby, but even a few years ago they would have come up with a better package.

User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#42 Post by Drucker » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:04 pm

mfunk9786 wrote:Who's to say that time is the only reason these packages aren't as complete as you'd like (I think Harold and Maude is a lovely release, for the record)? Bonus features for popular studio films like these are more expensive to get done, and I think they try to put an emphasis on quality over quantity. As much as I'd like to have seen a commentary/video essay on this one, who's to say that that was possible (wrangling worthwhile participants, cost, etc)?
On top of that, it does seem like the people making the disc might not have had access to all the behind-the-scenes/makings-of/featurettes. Look at how picky Harold/Maude cover art had to be! If the cover art alone can be such a headache, lord knows how much effort it takes to get great supplements.

User avatar
Professor Wagstaff
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:27 pm

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#43 Post by Professor Wagstaff » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:06 pm

Most of the titles released by Paramount over the years were transferred from some abominable prints. Harold and Maude was an ugly mess on the old DVD and now looks and sounds pristine. Features or not, I'm happy just to see these titles being rescued from a company that clearly didn't give a shit.

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#44 Post by mfunk9786 » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:10 pm

ianungstad wrote:They could have interviewed Bud Cort in addition to the other potential supplements that I listed above.
Says who? I realize he's not an international superstar but what makes you think he was waiting by the phone to be interviewed and that there weren't extenuating circumstances preventing the inclusion of an interview with him? It's so easy to make up fantasy releases in your mind, but you have to have some respect for the people who actually have to put these things together.

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Rosemary's Baby

#45 Post by zedz » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:10 pm

HerrSchreck wrote:Weak package? Or is it just me . . . I love this film and was really looking for some grandslamming extras on this.

Helps also that I'm reading Helter Skelter right now for--believe it or not-- the first time.
The first time? That does surprise me!

I'm with you on the extras front. I expected this to be a pull-out-all-the-stops headliner, the kind of thing that used to warrant a fully loaded two DVD set. Still, it will be nice to get a spiffing HD transfer.

User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#46 Post by The Narrator Returns » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:16 pm

ianungstad wrote:I'll buy Rosemary's Baby, but even a few years ago they would have come up with a better package.
You're wearing those rose-colored glasses again. A few years ago, they would have come up with an equal, if not lesser, package. There's a limit to what they can possibly include. I would have liked it if Criterion included The Kid Stays in the Picture, but licensing that would be a bitch, so they couldn't include. Criterion did as good of a job as they possibly could.

User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: Rosemary's Baby

#47 Post by Jeff » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:19 pm

zedz wrote:I'm with you on the extras front. I expected this to be a pull-out-all-the-stops headliner, the kind of thing that used to warrant a fully loaded two DVD set. Still, it will be nice to get a spiffing HD transfer.
The Komeda doc is 70 minutes, so it probably will be two DVDs. I agree though, about the somewhat disappointing slate of extras. A commentary would have been nice.

User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#48 Post by matrixschmatrix » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:20 pm

You can't necessarily judge the quality of a package by what isn't included, as one never knows what's been lost or is tied up with rights issues or whatever. And what's actually on Harold and Maude is great, I wish all their releases of late were that good.

This one looks a bit weak on paper, but the interviews Criterion puts out are sometimes incredibly in depth and worthwhile, and I'm going to pick this one up anyway. I do wish there was a commentary, though, this kind of movie seems ideal for one.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#49 Post by swo17 » Mon Jul 16, 2012 5:21 pm

Jeff wrote:The Komeda doc is 70 minutes, so it probably will be two DVDs. I agree though, about the somewhat disappointing slate of extras. A commentary would have been nice.
It is going to be two DVDs.

User avatar
Finch
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:09 pm
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Re: 634 Rosemary's Baby

#50 Post by Finch » Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:02 am

I'm glad this is coming from Crit regardless of how much extras it has or not after seeing Paramount giving Chinatown a merely OK high definition treatment.

Post Reply