Alejandro Jodorowsky
- Rsdio
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 11:42 am
- Location: UK
I've just noticed that El Topo is showing a few times this month in a cinema quite near me, I'll be going along but since I've never seen it before I'm not sure whether to watch the DVD once or twice in anticipation or have it all hit me for the first time on the big screen. Any suggestions as to how it might be best enjoyed?
- foggy eyes
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:58 am
- Location: UK
- Antoine Doinel
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
- Location: Montreal, Quebec
- Contact:
Even though the print of Holy Mountain I saw years ago in the cinema was definitely battered, I wouldn't have traded the experience of seeing it in a packed house for the world. The was a great energy from the audience and great whoops of enjoyment from the film's more outrageous moments.Rsdio wrote:I've just noticed that El Topo is showing a few times this month in a cinema quite near me, I'll be going along but since I've never seen it before I'm not sure whether to watch the DVD once or twice in anticipation or have it all hit me for the first time on the big screen. Any suggestions as to how it might be best enjoyed?
- Gropius
- Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:47 pm
I believe that the current UK screenings are actually digital (or are they digital restorations transferred to film? - can anyone who made it to the NFT retro confirm this?), so in effect you might just be watching the DVD on a bigger screen. But you should check the cinema details to verify this.Rsdio wrote:I've just noticed that El Topo is showing a few times this month in a cinema quite near me, I'll be going along but since I've never seen it before I'm not sure whether to watch the DVD once or twice in anticipation or have it all hit me for the first time on the big screen. Any suggestions as to how it might be best enjoyed?
-
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 12:15 pm
- Location: Philadelphia
Seeing The Holy Mountain on the big screen was like watching it for the first time, definitely go see them in a theater if you get the chance. The experience was almost physical, and made me very uncomfortable. However, that might have something to do with the joint I smoked beforehand (which I recommend).
- orlik
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:17 pm
- Location: London, UK
I completely agree - on the big screen, the film is like a visual and aural assault, in a nice way. Though I also recommend the DVD. Jodorowsky's commentary is excellent: informative, funny, with Jodorowsky his usual, amiably boastful self - he claims to have predicted the Taliban and Peruvian Shining Path through this film, and to have dealt with the subject of paedophilia before anyone else. Also tells some great anecdotes about the making of the film.patrick wrote:Seeing The Holy Mountain on the big screen was like watching it for the first time, definitely go see them in a theater if you get the chance. The experience was almost physical, and made me very uncomfortable. However, that might have something to do with the joint I smoked beforehand (which I recommend).
- LionelHutz
- Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:32 am
- Location: Italy
-
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:40 pm
- Location: Melbourne
-
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:25 am
- Location: Australia
When is the Melbourne festival? Is there a website?soma wrote:For those in Melbourne - both El Topo and The Holy Mountain are screening at this year's MIFF.
Having seen El Topo on the big screen at ACMI earlier this year I can't wait to do the same for The Holy Mountain (virgin experience). And my DVDs of both just arrived!
Jodorowsky collection will be released down here soon; RRP is $80, it only cost me $50AU to import it.
-
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:40 pm
- Location: Melbourne
^ I just ordered El Topo and The Holy Mountain from R1, cost me $15 AUD each including shipping as part of the DDD 20% off sale. Bargain!Solaris wrote:When is the Melbourne festival? Is there a website?soma wrote:For those in Melbourne - both El Topo and The Holy Mountain are screening at this year's MIFF.
Having seen El Topo on the big screen at ACMI earlier this year I can't wait to do the same for The Holy Mountain (virgin experience). And my DVDs of both just arrived!
Jodorowsky collection will be released down here soon; RRP is $80, it only cost me $50AU to import it.
It's an amazing Festival, the biggest in the Southern Hemisphere. I go every year, started off seeing about 10 and now average 40 - 50 per year. Usually around 400 films screening.
Last edited by soma on Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- posto
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:37 pm
- Location: Back of Beyond
FYI, Jodorovsky's book "The Spiritual Journey of Alejandro Jodorowsky: The Creator of El Topo" has just been released.
- Tommaso
- Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 am
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
Nice! This completely slipped under my radar. What is the general consensus on "The Rainbow Thief"? I know that Jodorowsky dismisses it, but might it be worth watching nevertheless, if only for the visuals?
-
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 8:19 pm
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
.
Last edited by LloydK on Sun Jan 20, 2019 8:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Jerryvonkramer
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
We watched the Holy Mountain last night.
My wife's thoughts:
I thought it was a total mess. More absurdist than surreal, and more like early Woody Allen or Monty Python than David Lynch ... only not very funny, not very insightful and so random as to end up meaning nothing.
The biggest thing I thought about it is that it seems to be very dated. Seems like Jodorowsky just had free reign to do what he liked and just filmed any and every idea he had with no quality control and got away with it in 1973 under the guise of being 'revolutionary'.
It does nothing to justify its lofty reputation among cult film enthusiasts and I was disappointed by it.
My wife's thoughts:
My own:The 40 minutes or so that I watched of that film was atrocious. Why? Because it tried it's hardest to be a "feast" of visual imagery and artistry. Instead, it was random chaos. What's the point in showing hundreds of frogs all dressed the same and then bathing them in blood? Or the man going nuts on hundreds of replicated Christ figures? Or suddenly cutting to a scene where you can have any face you want? Let's see, what analysis could we give that...a hallucinogenic study of mass consumerism and facile popular culture? Spirtialism vs Consumerism, is it? No. The film can piss off and die. It's a mess and nothing coheres. And that's why I refused to watch it.
And please note the sarcasm in my analysis. That film is pretentious and up it's own arse.
I thought it was a total mess. More absurdist than surreal, and more like early Woody Allen or Monty Python than David Lynch ... only not very funny, not very insightful and so random as to end up meaning nothing.
The biggest thing I thought about it is that it seems to be very dated. Seems like Jodorowsky just had free reign to do what he liked and just filmed any and every idea he had with no quality control and got away with it in 1973 under the guise of being 'revolutionary'.
It does nothing to justify its lofty reputation among cult film enthusiasts and I was disappointed by it.
- MyNameCriterionForum
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:27 am
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
No offense to your wife, but that's a pretty insubstantial review. The frogs aren't just "all dressed the same" for no reason: look at what they're wearing, and the object/models they're swarming over. It's a pretty obvious reference to colonialism, with intimations of biblical plague as well. The Christ figures, the crucified and skinned monkeys on parade, etc. all have similar, powerful connotations. I don't know if Jodorowsky is (or was Catholic) but c'mon, this is pretty obvious (even, admittedly, heavyhanded) symbolism for large swaths of the world's population.
I'll agree any "revolutionary" qualities attributed to the film are foolish (as revolutions almost always are, particularly those espoused by artists) but if you can't appreciate the hallucinatory brilliance of the imagery, or grasp the plot (and there is one, again, pretty basic to storytelling: the transformative quest) then I guess it's just different strokes.
I'll agree any "revolutionary" qualities attributed to the film are foolish (as revolutions almost always are, particularly those espoused by artists) but if you can't appreciate the hallucinatory brilliance of the imagery, or grasp the plot (and there is one, again, pretty basic to storytelling: the transformative quest) then I guess it's just different strokes.
- Jerryvonkramer
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 8:36 pm
- Contact:
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
I think the point she was making is: symbolism to what end? For what purpose? Is it enough for something simply to connote in film, or do we want it to cohere as well?MyNameCriterionForum wrote:No offense to your wife, but that's a pretty insubstantial review. The frogs aren't just "all dressed the same" for no reason: look at what they're wearing, and the object/models they're swarming over. It's a pretty obvious reference to colonialism, with intimations of biblical plague as well. The Christ figures, the crucified and skinned monkeys on parade, etc. all have similar, powerful connotations. I don't know if Jodorowsky is (or was Catholic) but c'mon, this is pretty obvious (even, admittedly, heavyhanded) symbolism for large swaths of the world's population.
The most overwhelmingly positive reviews of Holy Mountain praise primarily the first 20 minutes or so, almost without exception. While I admit they do have a certain unique energy, it does seem to be pretty aimless and scattershot. This is not a repeat of my earlier post: my point here is that it's all well and good saying "these are references to colonialism", "these are biblical references" - but those things in themselves are not virtues.
By all means, defend it and mount a defence - it's one of the reasons I am posting here, to understand why this film is so highly rated. Every once a while I'll watch a film with a reputation and wonder why it has it (others in that list include Night of the Hunter, Performance, Manhunter and The Big Lebowski - two of which I'd describe as incompetent). Holy Mountain has got to be one of the most overrated films I've ever come across.
-
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 12:28 pm
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
Does anyone know if the complete retro (minus only Tusk) showing at the Museum of Design in Manhattan (or whatever that museum in Columbus Circle is called) is 35mm or video? And is that venue any good?
- Alan Smithee
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 11:49 am
- Location: brooklyn
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
So I saw The Dance of Reality this week. I would say that I was pleasantly surprised by it. Most of the reviews I've read are fairly accurate with the Fellini comparisons. It's still very out there but less stream of consciousness. It's an autobiography told in a way that allows Jodorowsky to make his family what he wishes they had been. So in that way it's surprisingly moving. I don't really think about emotion when I think about Jodorowsky, except for maybe feeling sick. I was lucky enough to interview Jodorowsky about it if ya want to read it here. Something I couldn't include in the piece though is how excited by Digital Video he is. You can add one more old school filmmaker to the converted. I would say his results are fairly good with it. But the effects are a little cheesy. They have a handmade quality though that works for the film. It's good to see him back and he's trying to make a new flick, and just signed a contract to make Son Of El Topo as a graphic novel.
- Lowry_Sam
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2010 3:35 pm
- Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
So no one has seen Jodorowsky's Dune yet? I can't say I'm a fan of his work, but I am quite interested in seeing his vision for this, though I half anticipate being as disappointed as I was with Lost In La Mancha (ie. a standard doc not being as engaging a substitute as the "woulda/coulda/shoulda" film).
-
- Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 6:36 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
- Contact:
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
Saw it this weekend. It does look like something that could have actually been made and might have looked like Alien crossed with the 1980 Flash Gordon. Purists might have objected to some of the plot changes Jodorowsky introduced (no one involved seemed that interested in being faithful to the book). The talent involved makes one's mouth water although it probably wouldn't have been the Star Wars before Star Wars that most of the people in the film think it would have been. At least it would probably have been a movie you'd want to see more than once.Lowry_Sam wrote:So no one has seen Jodorowsky's Dune yet? I can't say I'm a fan of his work, but I am quite interested in seeing his vision for this, though I half anticipate being as disappointed as I was with Lost In La Mancha (ie. a standard doc not being as engaging a substitute as the "woulda/coulda/shoulda" film).
Best scene: Jodorowsky recounting his reaction to first seeing Lynch's Dune.
-
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:00 am
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
He told that story with slightly more exaggeration in Jonathan Ross' documentary:BrianInAtlanta wrote:Best scene: Jodorowsky recounting his reaction to first seeing Lynch's Dune.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iewxGhJdvq8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That whole documentary is worth seeing - particularly for his reaction to criticisms of violence in his movies!
Jod is definitely one of the most enjoyable interviewees around, though his comments seem almost normal these days compared to the outrageous prose-poetry he unleashed in his interview in the El Topo book.
- pzadvance
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:24 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Alejandro Jodorowsky
I thought it was a very fun "what-if" movie, but the interviews were a little too one-sided for me. Everyone involved is just fawning over this project in the most hyperbolic terms imaginable, then wildly speculating as to the potential impact it might have left on the industry. The truth of the matter is it's easy to idealize a project like this that never even got in front of the cameras--just looking at all the potentially volatile ingredients, any number of factors could have coalesced during production and post that would have prevented this from being the lost masterpiece everybody in the film expected it to be. It's highly likely it would have come out the other end just as compromised and half-realized as Lynch's Dune. Who's to say?