Warner Brothers Archive Collection (DVDs only)

Discuss North American DVDs and Blu-rays or other DVD and Blu-ray-related topics.
Post Reply
Message
Author
bamwc2
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:54 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1476 Post by bamwc2 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 1:58 pm

hearthesilence wrote:Strongly disagree, The Long Voyage Home is still a film of considerable merit. Gregg Toland's work hits his usual high standard, John Wayne actually does well in a role where he has to speak with an accent - a rarity for him - and the final scene is fantastic.
We'll just have to agree to disagree about every claim you made there.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1477 Post by domino harvey » Wed Apr 23, 2014 2:55 pm

We've had this (non-)debate on the board before and I am as mystified as ever that people willingly defend the Long Voyage Home, though this is the first time I've ever seen someone defend John Wayne's accent in the process-- I need a "yinyer beer" to deal with this!

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1478 Post by hearthesilence » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:36 pm

Hah, well if you ever need a reason to start on heroin, try Armond White's site.

giovannii84
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 4:44 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact:

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1479 Post by giovannii84 » Wed Apr 23, 2014 4:29 pm

captveg wrote:Warner is usually pretty good about that, even in the WA. Were those extras specifically related to the film, or just bonus films from the same era?
The 2 shorts are from the era.

The extras related to the film are the trailer (which is being ported over), an audio outtake of the song 'Sometimes I'm Happy' & a Music-Only track for the film

I was looking forward to getting this because I totally adore Ann Miller, but don't think it's worth upgrading now, seeing as the DVD has more on it.

User avatar
Cold Bishop
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:45 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1480 Post by Cold Bishop » Thu Apr 24, 2014 12:18 am

domino harvey wrote:We've had this (non-)debate on the board before and I am as mystified as ever that people willingly defend the Long Voyage Home, though this is the first time I've ever seen someone defend John Wayne's accent in the process-- I need a "yinyer beer" to deal with this!
While I admit I dislike the middle story (which I feel I've seen dozens of times in sitcoms and cartoons growing up) I'm mystified that people don't like it. It's a sumptuous film with such a wonderfully poetic atmosphere of sea and fog. The opening scene, of the men on board aching for women, and the finale, with the wind sweeping the port, are what moviemaking is all about. Ford may never have been more stylish than here.

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1481 Post by knives » Thu Apr 24, 2014 12:33 am

Yeah, I don't think it's a great film (though it's my favorite Ford in that style), but it has so many positives going for it I really don't understand the strong dismissal that comes up every time.

User avatar
Grisbi
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 12:19 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1482 Post by Grisbi » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:24 pm

Though I love Ford so much, I'd been primed to dismiss Voyage when I finally got around to it for a multitude of reasons, but I was really surprised at what a beautiful, somber, haunting film it was. And so incredibly Fordian, in a way that something like Grapes is not at all. I saw it again not too long ago and thought even better of it. Masterpiece, imo.

Wayne's accent may be a joke, but physically he is able to sustain this very subtly expressive melancholy throughout, I think it is actually a very good performance.

I'd but a Blu-ray of it in a heartbeat, really would love for it to get a release.


User avatar
mistakaninja
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 5:15 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1484 Post by mistakaninja » Tue Jun 24, 2014 8:38 am

1.37:1? It was shot full frame but I thought Cronenberg approved the 1.66 LD Criterion put out? The New Line DVD was 1.78.

User avatar
Adam X
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 5:04 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1485 Post by Adam X » Tue Jun 24, 2014 9:05 am

Having long been fascinated with Cronenberg's work, I have to say the one thing I've really been pining for was for one of his most powerful films to be released as a full frame DVD-R.
Thanks so much Warner Archive. You guys rock.

criterion10

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1486 Post by criterion10 » Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:17 am

Those bastards. After Videodrome, Crash might be my favorite Cronenberg film, so this is rather disappointing. ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
mistakaninja wrote:1.37:1? It was shot full frame but I thought Cronenberg approved the 1.66 LD Criterion put out? The New Line DVD was 1.78.
The Warner Bros. website is infamous for a variety of errors like such. My guess is that the DVD is in its proper 1.78:1 aspect ratio, unless WB just managed to fuck it up and include only the full frame version.

User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:25 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1487 Post by EddieLarkin » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:01 pm

A WAC DVD release doesn't necessarily preclude a Blu-ray coming from an indie label, assuming WB are willing to licence. Two Rode Together got a TCM DVD release only a few months before Twilight Time announced the Blu-ray.

Still, it's not encouraging.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1488 Post by domino harvey » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:04 pm

Are there any examples of a title coming to burned MOD from Warners and then coming out from another R1 label?

User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1489 Post by The Narrator Returns » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:06 pm

The only example I can think of isn't an example, because we still don't know if Whit Stillman convinced Warner Bros. to let Criterion have Barcelona.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1490 Post by domino harvey » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:09 pm

For the record, I'd love to be proved wrong by either of the above examples coming from Criterion. But I wouldn't bet on it

User avatar
EddieLarkin
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2012 10:25 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1491 Post by EddieLarkin » Tue Jun 24, 2014 12:20 pm

Annoyingly, it's Sony of all people who own the film in the U.K. (in other words, it'll never get a BD release over here!)
domino harvey wrote:I'd love to be proved wrong by either of the above examples coming from Criterion.
Along with Show Boat :cry:

felipe
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 11:06 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1492 Post by felipe » Tue Jun 24, 2014 1:33 pm

domino harvey wrote:Are there any examples of a title coming to burned MOD from Warners and then coming out from another R1 label?
Not exactly another label, but Get Carter was re-released on dvd by WAC just before WHV announced the blu-ray.

User avatar
feihong
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:20 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1493 Post by feihong » Tue Jun 24, 2014 2:37 pm

A little off-topic for a second, but my nearly 100-year-old grandmother watched some movies with me a couple of weekends ago. She hates both violence and fantasy in most movies, and Some Like it Hot is probably her favorite picture. We watched two pictures whose aims I would describe as nearly diametrically opposite one another. She was nonplussed by The Tarnished Angels, but she was surprisingly enraptured by every minute of the Get Carter bluray. I did not see that coming.

User avatar
whaleallright
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:56 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1494 Post by whaleallright » Tue Jun 24, 2014 6:42 pm

it's funny that despite knowing her distaste for violence in movies, you showed her Get Carter

User avatar
feihong
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:20 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1495 Post by feihong » Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:38 pm

It was a coincidence, really: she came into the room and I happened to be checking the disc. She decided almost instantly that she wanted me to keep it playing. She had never seen Michael Caine in a movie before, and she found his screen persona exceptionally compelling. The night before I had pulled out The Tarnished Angels as a picture I thought she might actually enjoy, and she thought it was precious, shrill and maudlin. So it did surprise me quite a bit to find that Get Carter was more her speed.

As for the violence thing, I really take that prohibition with a grain of salt. How many movies out there really steer clear of such stuff? Her favorite film, Some Like it Hot, features the St. Valentine's Day massacre, and Edward Robinson Jr. icing George Raft almost point blank with a tommy gun. That's some violent sh*t if you ever stop and think about it. I would say that the violence in Get Carter is comparably cruel, and only slightly more bloody. But is this stuff actually more violent because there's more blood on display?

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1496 Post by domino harvey » Thu Aug 07, 2014 3:54 pm

I was just either threatened or insulted by Warner Archives' latest email title

Image

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1497 Post by FrauBlucher » Sat Aug 09, 2014 7:34 pm

Not sure why I'm posting this :roll: ......

This is Glenn Erickson's review of Out of the Past. His PQ reviews are always very limited to the most general of observations. So, take it with a grain of salt, because he dropped this little nugget for Children of Paradise:
Criterion's Blu-ray of Children of Paradise sparkles as never before thanks to Pathé's 2011 restoration, which was performed at 4K resolution.
But hopefully, Out of the Past does look as good as he suggests.

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1498 Post by FrauBlucher » Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:43 am


User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1499 Post by tenia » Mon Aug 11, 2014 11:46 am

So WAC, which is considered the "discount" branch of Warner, gives a BD-50 for a 97 min B&W 1.37 with only 1 2.0 lossless track and barely any weighty extras, but WHV keeps on straining video bitrates to less than 20 Mbps ?

User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:28 pm

Re: Warner Brothers Archive Collection

#1500 Post by captveg » Mon Aug 11, 2014 4:02 pm

I wouldn't call it their "discount" branch. It's their "special interest" branch for more niche (from a marketing view) titles.

Post Reply